The mEducation Alliance Evidence Showcase

The Alliance will compile and showcase rigorous, innovative, and relevant evaluations for practitioners, policy makers, and researchers to use. The studies showcased on this page were sent to the mEducation Alliance directly, or were found in the course of members’ ICT4E work. If you would like to suggest an evaluation or resource to include on the Showcase page, please contact us at medalliance@meducationalliance.org.

Know a researcher doing great work in the area of ICT4E or are you that researcher? If so the mEducation Alliance is collecting profiles in a database of promising ICT4E research, especially those focused on COVID-19 responses. You can find a full description of the database here and submit profiles using this form. If you have any questions please reach out to Helen Crompton or John Traxler.

external_website_1_0-children-raising-hands-school

 

 

 

 

“The Future of Learning and Technology in Deprived Contexts” by Tim Unwin, Mark Weber, Meaghan Brugha and David Hollow

Drawing on interviews, experience, and a review of recent literature, this report looks to the future of ICT in education with a focus on primary schooling. The authors make broad conclusions for what the future of ICT4E will hold, but in the near-term note that there should be better use of existing technologies and a stronger emphasis on online protection for children. This is an excellent document for understanding where ICT4E currently is and where it may be going.

“Evaluating the effectiveness of computers as tutors in China” by Di Mo, Yu Bai, Matthew Boswell, and Scott Rozelle.

This evaluation studies the effect of teacher assisted learning (CAL) and computer assisted instruction (CAI) on English scores in China. Overall, CAL had a stronger effect on scores than CAI, but results vary based on who is implementing the program. Government implementation was less effective than implementation managed by the researchers, which raises important questions about scale-up, generalizability, and program design. This is an excellent study for gaining a better understanding of how technology can be integrated into teaching and learning.

“Disrupting Education? Experimental Evidence on Technology-Aided Instruction in India” by Karthik Muralidharan, Abhijeet Singh, and Alejandro J. Ganimian.

This paper provides an excellent summary of the challenges in evaluating education technology interventions, discusses the impact of a platform neutral education technology program, and includes a discussion of the cost constraints in educating students in low- and middle-income countries. The paper’s authors conduct a randomized evaluation of Mindspark, a technology-led instructional program in India, with a focus on secondary school students. There are five main findings, including the fact that students who participated in the Mindspark program more than doubled their test scores in Hindi and math.

“Books or Laptops? The Cost-Effectiveness of Shifting from Printed to Digital Delivery of Educational Content” by Rosangela Bando, Francisco Gallego, Paul Gertler, Dario Romero Fonseca.

Print or digital? This RCT evaluation of a program in high-poverty Honduran schools asks the question that has vexed education researchers and newspaper publishers alike. The researchers find that low-income students in Honduras are similar to people everywhere: easily distracted when in front of a computer. Replacing print textbooks with digital lessons did not improve scores, but it is slightly more cost-effective. Given that technology may provide resources at a lower cost, but does not automatically raise or affect scores, this paper is excellent for setting a discussion of how best to use and deliver technology in the classroom.

“The impact of education programmes on learning and school participation in low- and middle-income countries” by Birte Snilstveit, Jennifer Stevenson, Radhika Menon, Daniel Phillips, Emma Gallagher, Maisie Geleen, Hannah Jobse, Tanja Schmidt, and Emmanuel Jimenez.

This systemic review covers evidence from 216 education programs, based on impact evaluations as well as mix-methods research. The authors cover what works in education programming, what doesn’t work, what is promising, and what remains unknown. On page 31, the authors address 16 programs involving computer-assisted learning. The results for computer and technology assisted learning are mixed, with some improved scores in math and improvement in student attendance. They find that in some cases ICT4E interventions actually decrease learning, particularly when technology is introduced to replace a traditional educator, and that education technology is often not properly integrated into schools and that teachers are often not trained properly in ICT4E use. It is worth noting that many of the studies included in the meta-analysis focus on providing technology inputs, such as One Laptop per Child, and that a majority of the standardized results are not statistically significant.

Fifteen ed tech research papers
A terrific compilation from our friends at the EdTech Hub citing 15 ed tech research papers which they share all the time. Please send them a friendly greeting to thank them for their work.